The proposed Digital Rights Protection Authority (DRPA) in Pakistan is facing revisions after initial criticism from political parties and digital rights activists. The draft, which aimed to replace existing social media regulations, was seen as potentially stifling free speech.
A committee led by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s advisor is now refining the proposal. Key changes include streamlining the complaint process. Only those directly affected by online content will be able to file complaints, and a system will be established to verify the legitimacy of both the complainant and the complaint itself.
The committee also wants to ensure a balance between regulating online abuse and protecting free speech. While acknowledging the prevalence of online hate speech and harassment, they emphasize that any new legislation should not give authorities excessive power to silence legitimate expression or use the law for political gain.
Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar supports regulating social media content, highlighting the lack of accountability compared to traditional media. He advocates for measures to counter fake news and defamation online.
The proposed DRPA would replace the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA) of 2016. However, there’s some confusion as the new authority would be established through amendments to PECA, suggesting potential inconsistencies.
National Cyber Crime Investigation Agency (NCCIA), which recently replaced the FIA’s cybercrime wing, will also operate under the DRPA. However, the NCCIA’s functionality remains dependent on the DRPA’s establishment through parliamentary approval.
The legislation aims to make social media platforms like Instagram, TikTok, X (formerly Twitter), YouTube, and Facebook responsible for blocking content that violates Pakistani guidelines.
Digital rights activists remain concerned about the “secretive nature” of the drafting process. Some, like Haroon Baloch, haven’t received a response from the IT ministry regarding their requests for involvement.
The IT ministry maintains the draft will become public when presented to parliament for discussion by relevant committees. However, the process is lengthy, involving cabinet approval and parliamentary debate.
The upcoming budget session in parliament may delay further discussion on the DRPA, as other legislative priorities take precedence.
The revised DRPA proposal suggests the government’s attempt to find a balance between combating online abuses and safeguarding free speech. While concerns remain regarding transparency and potential misuse, the ongoing revisions suggest a willingness to address these issues.
