In late January 2026, as large scale displacement began from Pakistan’s remote Tirah Valley, two parallel realities unfolded simultaneously. On the ground, families moved through harsh winter conditions toward temporary registration points, carrying limited belongings and facing deep uncertainty. In the digital space, however, a separate narrative battle emerged, as online accounts attempted to frame and reinterpret the events for global audiences. Official registrations by authorities indicated that nearly 10,000 families, amounting to around 70,000 individuals or almost half of the valley’s population, left the area amid fears linked to an anticipated security operation. While this represented a major humanitarian challenge, the online discourse surrounding the movement quickly became contested, with competing versions of events circulating widely across social media.
Local administrators and relief agencies reported that many displaced families arrived in nearby Bara with little more than basic necessities, placing significant strain on registration systems that were expanded to cope with the scale of movement. Provincial leaders publicly questioned federal assertions that the displacement was voluntary, pointing to mosque announcements, deadlines, and an atmosphere that left families with limited practical alternatives. At the same time, videos and testimonies shared online by international media outlets and journalists showed women and children struggling with cold, loss of livelihood, and abrupt disruption of daily life. These firsthand accounts emphasized the human cost of the displacement, yet they increasingly competed with social media posts that reframed those leaving Tirah as external infiltrators or portrayed the clearing of the area in neutral or approving terms. As a result, the reality of people fleeing was not disputed, but the perceived causes and moral framing of the movement became heavily influenced by algorithm driven feeds rather than verified reporting.
Within this digital environment, researchers and regional monitors highlighted the role of an account commonly referred to as Nukta, which they described as a recurring reference point for amplified grievance driven narratives. According to open source investigators, the account does not function as an explicit recruitment channel but employs influence techniques that include repeated delegitimization of state institutions, normalization of violent resistance, and selective amplification of content that erodes public empathy for displaced civilians. Analysts noted that this form of messaging sits in a grey area between political speech and incitement, making it harder for automated systems to flag while still lowering the threshold for acceptance of violence. Geolocation and timing analysis conducted by independent investigators suggested behavioral patterns consistent with activity originating outside Pakistan, including coordinated amplification from networks associated with Central Asian language spaces. While attribution remains complex and probabilistic, the immediate effect has been the same, intensifying an already sensitive security situation by injecting polarizing narratives into mainstream discourse.
The influence of such accounts is closely tied to changes in platform governance. Since its acquisition by Elon Musk, X has significantly reduced its trust and safety capacity, shifting toward a reporting driven model with leaner regional teams. Multiple media reports have documented a sharp decline in moderation staffing, leaving the platform with limited ability to detect coded language, non English rhetoric, and synchronized amplification campaigns. Organizations monitoring extremist and grievance based use of technology platforms have warned that such gaps allow harmful narratives to spread faster than they can be reviewed, particularly in regions where linguistic and cultural context is essential. In conflict affected areas like Tirah, disinformation acts as a force multiplier, shaping public attitudes, weakening humanitarian appeals, and reinforcing hardened positions that can justify further securitized responses. Although platform policies prohibit praise or support for violent activity and coordinated disinformation, enforcement remains inconsistent. Civil society groups report limited transparency from X when region specific threats are flagged, leaving questions about how such narratives are assessed and addressed. As the displacement from Tirah continues to reverberate online, the struggle over information has become an additional burden for communities already facing displacement, turning their lived experiences into contested digital narratives they never sought to be part of.
Follow the SPIN IDG WhatsApp Channel for updates across the Smart Pakistan Insights Network covering all of Pakistan’s technology ecosystem.
